aberts smits signin for 3 years

aberts smits aint exactly a blockbuster signing if u ask me tbh @Rangers4 was hopin for more and we still got problems on d

i get what u mean bruh, 3 years aint too much of a commitment tbh, but like smits seemed to be the best option they had left after fa

idk if best option is the right words, @RangersEnjoyer, they had options in fa and i still think theyre trying to patch stuff up on d instead of rebuildin what we have honestly

@Rangers4 said:

idk if best option is the right words, @RangersEnjoyer, they had options in fa and i still think theyre trying to patch stuff up on d instead of rebuildin…

idk if patching stuff up on d is even a good way to put it honestly, feels like theyre just trying to tread water for now and hope something sticks man @RangersEnjoyer i feel u on smits being the best option left though

@section7nyr said:

idk if patching stuff up on d is even a good way to put it honestly, feels like theyre just trying to tread water for now and hope something sticks man…

treading water is a good way to put it man @section7nyr, its like theyre just trying to get by till the kids are ready to contribute

i still think @brian_rangers hit the nail on the head about what we got with smits tbh, 3 years isn't long enough to turn us around man

@Rangers4 said:

i still think @brian_rangers hit the nail on the head about what we got with smits tbh, 3 years isn't long enough to turn us around man

i still think 3 years is a luxury we cant afford ngl, hope smits proves me wrong but i got a bad feeling about this man

@brian_rangers said:

i still think 3 years is a luxury we cant afford ngl, hope smits proves me wrong but i got a bad feeling about this man

i think thats a bit harsh, 3 years is a decent amount of time to see some development from the kids and smits can be that stopgap until they're ready honestly @Rangers4