tyson hinds signing is probably just depth at d man

im not sure what to expect from him either but its been a while since we had some actual depth in that area dont recall anyone complaining about that recently

@Ducks19 said:

im not sure what to expect from him either but its been a while since we had some actual depth in that area dont recall anyone complaining about that recently

yeah i know u r right, i remember people trashing us for having no d depth after the mcdavid trade lol im all for adding some legit bottom six D now man

@DucksNation lol McDavid trade was yrs ago

yeah i know its yrs ago but ppl r still complaining bout no d depth now lol

@sam_t87 said:

yeah i know its yrs ago but ppl r still complaining bout no d depth now lol

ikr? people always got something to complain about ngl our d is still a mess imo

@mike_ducks said:

ikr? people always got something to complain about ngl our d is still a mess imo

tbh our d is actually a lot deeper than some people think it is, been liking the prospects we have coming up man

@Ducks19 said:

tbh our d is actually a lot deeper than some people think it is, been liking the prospects we have coming up man

i dont think our d is as deep as some ppl think it is man, still got a lot of question marks at the ruard position

@mike_ducks said:

i dont think our d is as deep as some ppl think it is man, still got a lot of question marks at the ruard position

ngl our d is a mess but like i think theyre trying to fix it man, signing hinds and all. maybe we'll finally get some legit depth at least

ngl i kinda agree man, signing hinds and maybe more moves like that could finally help us get some legit depth on d @mike_ducks said it's still got question marks at the ruard position but honestly i think we need to start seeing some results now or its just excuses imo